data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fbaa/6fbaa039834d5a3c4c57bacb04d900cd62ffa71f" alt="Interpretting diskmark 6.0 scores"
- Interpretting diskmark 6.0 scores drivers#
- Interpretting diskmark 6.0 scores windows 10#
- Interpretting diskmark 6.0 scores pro#
Interpretting diskmark 6.0 scores pro#
CystalDiskmark – Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500GB:īenchmark Results: The Samsung SSD 860 PRO 500GB drive reached 563.7 MB/s read and 533.5 MB/s write in the standard sequential write test and Random 4K performance was 44.66 MB/s read and 124.8 MB/s write.īenchmark Results: The Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500GB drive reached 507.2 MB/s read and 482.5 MB/s write in the standard sequential write test at a queue depth of one. Note that CDM only supports Native Command Queuing (NCQ) with a queue depth of 32 (as noted) and shows the highest score of five runs. It should be noted that this is the first SATA III drive that we have ever tested to reach 566 MB/s sequential read speeds! The Samsung SSD 860 EVO really does milk all the performance one can get from the SATA III interface!īenchmark Results: There isn’t a huge difference between most SATA III SSDs when it comes to sequential read/write performance, but Samsung’s 860 EVO 500GB drive stands out as having the best performance at the lower block sizes and is right up there at the higher sizes.ĬrystalDiskMark is a small benchmark utility for drives and enables rapid measurement of sequential and random read/write speeds. This drive is rated at up to 520 MB/s max sequential read and 520 MB/s max sequential write, so we exceeded both of those scores on our test platform. ATTO – Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500GB:īenchmark Results: ATTO showed the Samsung SSD 860 500 GB drive reaching speeds of up to 566 MB/s read and 536 MB/s write in the standard overlapped I/O benchmark. The test was run with the default runs of 0.5KB through 64MB transfer sizes with the total length being 256MB. It measures raw transfer rates for both reads and writes and places the data into graphs that can be very easily interpreted. ATTO measures transfers across a specific volume length. Keep in mind that the two Samsung 850 PRO SSDs are using hardware RAID1, which seems to help their sequential read performance, and that the two NVMe devices are both using the native Microsoft NVMe drivers, which may be hurting their performance somewhat.įigure 1: 512GB Samsung 950 Pro M.ATTO is one of the oldest drive benchmarks still being used today and is still very relevant in the SSD world. Lexar's rated read/write speeds for the NM620's 512GB version are up to 3,300MBps read and. Table 1: Sequential and Random Results (Queue Depth 32, 1 Thread) This trio of tests involves copying large files or folders from one location on the test drive to another. As you can see below, both the Samsung 950 PRO and the Intel 750 PCIe NVMe cards have tremendous sequential and random I/O performance! Device
Interpretting diskmark 6.0 scores drivers#
The two NVMe devices are both using the native Microsoft NVMe drivers from Windows 10. I did some quick and dirty I/O testing today with CrystalDiskMark 5.02.
Interpretting diskmark 6.0 scores windows 10#
This system has Windows 10 Professional installed, so it has native NVMe drivers available from Microsoft. I believe that with a bit more of practice you can surely score far better than this one. If seen on a normal basis, then it isn't a very good score. The score is judged good or bad depending upon the requirement of the college you are applying to. The Intel Z170 Express chipset supports 26 PCIe 3.0 lanes, so you need to think about what devices you are trying to use. An overall score of 6.0 is an average score. Since I have an NVidia GeForce GTX 960 video card in one of the PCI 3.0 x16 slots, both that slot and the PCI 3.0 x16 slot that the Intel 750 is using will go down to x8 (which means 8 lanes instead of 16 lanes). (1) 6TB Western Digital SATA III hard drive in a SATA III port.(1) 400GB Intel 750 PCIe NVMe card in a PCIe 3.0 x16 slot.(1) 512GB Samsung 950 PRO M.2 PCIe 3.0 NVMe card in an Ultra M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 slot.(2) 512GB Samsung 850 PRO SATA III SSDs in RAID 1 (using the chipset RAID controller) So, here are some quick comparative CrystalDiskMark results in 2020 from those six drives.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dfd3/0dfd31d749a5cb1b76c4375d00a6c00f0cd3511f" alt="interpretting diskmark 6.0 scores interpretting diskmark 6.0 scores"
As of now, here is the available storage in this system: The latest addition to the storage family is a brand new 512GB Samsung 950 PRO M.2 PCIe NVMe card that just arrived from Amazon yesterday afternoon. By design, this system has several different types of storage devices, so I can take advantage of the extra PCIe bandwidth in the latest Intel Z170 Express chipset, and do some comparative testing. I have some details about this system as described in Building a Z170 Desktop System with a Core i7-6700K Skylake Processor. Check them out here.)Ī few weeks ago, I built a new Intel Skylake desktop system that I am going to start using as my primary workstation in the near future. The performance results were similar to Samsungs TLC based-SSD. (New: we’ve published a range of SQL Server interview candidate screening assessments with our partner Kandio, so you can avoid hiring an ‘expert’ who ends up causing problems.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fbaa/6fbaa039834d5a3c4c57bacb04d900cd62ffa71f" alt="Interpretting diskmark 6.0 scores"